Close-up of a mature woman's face and eyes, wearing a white robe
Home / Procedures / Safety, recovery and revision / Blepharoplasty scars

Blepharoplasty scars

Blepharoplasty scars sit in the upper eyelid crease, below the lower lashes, or inside the lid itself (no visible scar). In most patients they heal to a thin, pale line, because incision placement and the patient's own skin biology matter more than the technique and tools used. Hypertrophic (raised, red) scarring after cosmetic eyelid surgery is uncommon, about 1%, and keloid scarring is rare, with none reported in a systematic review.

How it is done

Medical illustrations, labelled. The numbers match the key.

Two-panel medical illustration of the right eye from the front. Left: eye closed, a crescent of skin and a strip of orbicularis muscle removed between violet marking lines in the upper lid crease, exposing the orbital septum and the pale nasal fat pad. Right: eye open after surgery, with a fine sutured incision in the crease that ends a little beyond the outer corner of the eye.

Upper blepharoplasty

Upper eyelid skin is removed through an incision in the natural crease (left), and the wound is closed so the scar lies in the crease (right).

  1. Lower incision line in the eyelid crease
  2. Upper incision line
  3. Orbital septum
  4. Central fat pad behind the septum
  5. Nasal fat pad
  6. Orbicularis oculi, cut edge
  7. Lateral end of the incision
  8. Closed incision in the eyelid crease
  9. Lateral end of the closed incision

Anatomy checked against StatPearls. Blepharoplasty, StatPearls. Anatomy, Head and Neck: Eyelid, Hwang K. Surgical anatomy of the upper eyelid relating to upper blepharoplasty or blepharoptosis surgery. Anat Cell Biol 2013.

Two side-section medical illustrations of the lower eyelid, face to the right. Left: the conjunctiva and lower lid retractors are opened on the inner surface of the lid and the central fat pad bulges through, with the skin, orbicularis and septum untouched. Right: a skin incision just below the lashes, a strip of pretarsal orbicularis kept, the skin and muscle lifted as one flap off the septum down to the rim, and the septum opened over the fat. Dashed arrows show each route.

Lower blepharoplasty approaches

The lower eyelid fat is reached either through the inside of the lid (left, transconjunctival) or through a skin incision just below the lashes (right, subciliary).

  1. Transconjunctival incision
  2. Central fat pad
  3. Orbital septum, not opened
  4. Skin and orbicularis, not cut
  5. Lower tarsus
  6. Inferior oblique muscle
  7. Subciliary skin incision
  8. Pretarsal orbicularis, preserved
  9. Skin-muscle flap
  10. Plane in front of the septum
  11. Orbital septum, opened
  12. Central fat pad

Anatomy checked against StatPearls. Transconjunctival Blepharoplasty, StatPearls. Blepharoplasty Subciliary Approach, StatPearls. Anatomy, Head and Neck: Eyelid, Hwang K. Surgical anatomy of the lower eyelid relating to lower blepharoplasty. Anat Cell Biol 2010.

Incision placement

  • Upper blepharoplasty places its incision within the natural upper eyelid crease, where the scar is hidden by the fold of skin above it; detail on crease-height planning is in Upper blepharoplasty (PMID 15536308).
  • Lower blepharoplasty places its incision either just below the lower lashes, where the lash line conceals it once healed (see Lower blepharoplasty), or on the inner surface of the lid, which leaves no visible external scar. The inside-the-lid approach caused no lid retraction or ectropion in the consecutive cases reported; full detail is in Transconjunctival blepharoplasty (PMID 2771349).
  • A skin pinch removes a fold of loose lower lid skin without undermining, placing its scar along the same lash line. About 8 mm of skin was removed on average, and a few patients had temporary scleral show (PMID 18434828).
  • Darker Fitzpatrick skin types carry a higher risk of a more visible scar after upper blepharoplasty regardless of incision placement. Vancouver Scar Scale scores at 6 months rose with darker skin type, driven by pigmentation change rather than vascularity, pliability or scar height (PMID 42557456).
  • Blepharoplasty scars were more visible than scars from tear-duct surgery (external dacryocystorhinostomy) on two scar scales 1 to 3 years after surgery, though patient satisfaction did not differ between the two groups (PMID 40355707).
  • Asian and White patients perceive blepharoplasty scars differently: White facial-surgery patients, blepharoplasty patients among them, rated scar appearance, psychosocial impact and career and sexual well-being more positively than Asian patients (PMID 41263428).

Suture technique trials

  • Incision tool (scalpel, radiofrequency or CO2 laser) and suture material did not change the final scar in a 2026 evidence review of upper blepharoplasty scar optimization (PMID 41193896).
  • In a paired-eye trial, intradermal and continuous 6-0 nylon closure gave equal scar quality at 6 months, and about 4 in 5 patients rated the result much or very much improved regardless of suture technique (PMID 42118953).
  • A systematic review comparing absorbable and non-absorbable sutures in upper eyelid blepharoplasty found equal scar quality and complication rates. Running against interrupted technique affected early swelling but not long-term scar outcome, and no included study measured whether absorbable sutures actually reduced follow-up visits (PMID 41062983).
  • Botulinum toxin injected into the lateral orbicularis muscle at wound closure produced narrower lower-lid scars on the treated side in Asian patients, though blinded scar-scale scores were the same between sides (PMID 34128526).
  • A survey of plastic, facial plastic, oculoplastic and dermatologic surgeons found nearly all use neuromodulators in their practice, but only about 1 in 5 use them to optimize scars and about 1 in 8 to optimize blepharoplasty outcomes (PMID 39989708).

Scar outcomes and hypertrophic scarring rates

  • A systematic review of eyelid procedures found hypertrophic scarring in about 1% of patients and no keloid after cosmetic eyelid surgery (PMID 36797842).
  • Contour change, asymmetry and visible scarring tend to present later in the postoperative course than bleeding or lid-position problems, which present in the first weeks (PMID 20195127).
  • In a single-blinded trial of intraoperative platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in upper blepharoplasty, patient- and observer-reported scar scores were significantly lower in the PRP group at both 1 and 6 months, though PRP gave no added benefit on anxiety, depression or quality-of-life measures (PMID 42788940).
  • In a trial of injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF), with one eyelid treated and the other as control, the treated side had less swelling and pain and more favorable Vancouver Scar Scale scores (PMID 41735797).

Risks and complications

  • Hypertrophic scarring and keloid are both more likely with wound tension, infection, and individual scarring tendency than with the specific incision tool or suture used, per the 2026 evidence review (PMID 41193896).
  • Patients with darker Fitzpatrick skin types and patients of Asian ethnicity are each reported to carry a higher risk of a visible or distressing scar after blepharoplasty than lighter-skinned or White patients, based on separate objective scar-scale and patient-reported-outcome studies (PMID 42557456), (PMID 41263428).
  • Eyelid keloid, though rare, does occur and has been studied with laser and growth-factor treatment, discussed under Treatment below (PMID 39197180). Rates of hemorrhage, dry eye, lid malposition and wound dehiscence are reported by procedure in Blepharoplasty complications.

Treatment

  • Topical silicone gel showed no advantage over plain petrolatum ointment on redness, elevation, pigmentation or patient satisfaction in a double-blinded trial of patients having bilateral upper blepharoplasty or ptosis repair, with follow-up of about 11 weeks (PMID 39946309).
  • Despite that trial, an earlier series found a silicone-based scar cream cut the need for triamcinolone or 5-fluorouracil injection for hypertrophic or cicatricial scarring after upper blepharoplasty from about 4 in 10 eyelids to about 2 in 10, so silicone is used as a first-line, low-risk option before injection therapy (PMID 31141848).
  • Injectable 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), with or without a low-dose steroid added, was used safely after periorbital skin grafting: no skin thinning, telangiectasia or infection, and about 9 in 10 patients were satisfied (PMID 25025385).
  • Fractional CO2 laser, personalized to each scar's characteristics rather than delivered at uniform settings (the "Manual One-shot Learning Technique," MOST), was used for hypertrophic or keloid eyelid scars. 1 to 3 sessions brought about 9 in 10 patients to more than 75% scar clearance, and about 1 in 10 had recurrence (PMID 40574505).
  • Ultra-pulsed CO2 fractional laser combined with recombinant human epidermal growth factor gel beat the laser alone for eyelid keloid, with a greater fall in scar and itch scores and a lower 1-year recurrence rate (PMID 39197180).
  • A low-fluence 1064-nm Q-switched Nd:YAG laser, a wavelength usually used for pigment, was reported as a novel treatment for hypertrophic scarring after combined blepharoplasty and epicanthoplasty in a single case (PMID 26820981).
  • Topical Hypericum perforatum (St. John's wort) extract applied after upper blepharoplasty gave significantly better wound-healing (REEDA) and Vancouver scar scores at 2 weeks and 1 month than no treatment, but no significant long-term difference in final scar appearance by 2 months (PMID 40877601).
  • In a small split-face trial of topical Aloe vera, early (1-week) reduction in scar vascularity and pigmentation correlated strongly with higher patient satisfaction at 3 months, a correlation that did not hold in untreated control eyelids in the same patients (PMID 42428186).
  • Botulinum toxin injection at closure is used by a minority of surgeons specifically for scar optimization, and trial data for lower blepharoplasty show it narrows the visible scar without changing blinded scar-scale scores; see Suture technique trials above (PMID 34128526), (PMID 39989708).

Recovery

  • Scar redness and swelling in the first weeks are normal healing, not a sign of hypertrophic scarring (full timelines are in Blepharoplasty recovery timeline). The first week's appearance has prognostic value: less vascularity and pigmentation at 1 week predicted higher patient satisfaction at 3 months in a small split-face trial (PMID 42428186).
  • Topical Hypericum perforatum's benefit over no treatment was measurable only in the first postoperative month and had faded by 2 months, consistent with an effect on early healing rather than final scar quality (PMID 40877601).
  • Laser treatment of an established hypertrophic or keloid eyelid scar is given after the scar has matured, in 1 to 3 sessions, rather than in the immediate postoperative period (PMID 40574505).

Current questions

  • Whether topical silicone meaningfully improves eyelid scars is unresolved: a rigorous double-blinded trial found no advantage over petrolatum (PMID 39946309), while an earlier series found it reduced the need for injection therapy (PMID 31141848).
  • Absorbable sutures are theorized to reduce follow-up burden by removing the need for suture removal, but no study identified has quantified this benefit in visits or resource use (PMID 41062983).
  • Regenerative adjuncts (platelet-rich plasma, platelet-rich fibrin) show early positive scar-quality signals in small trials, but longer-term, multicenter confirmation is not yet available (PMID 42788940), (PMID 41735797).
  • Neuromodulator use for scar optimization remains uncommon in practice (about 1 in 5 surveyed surgeons) despite trial evidence of a narrower resulting scar, a gap between evidence and adoption that has not been explained (PMID 39989708), (PMID 34128526).
  • Ethnic and skin-type differences in scar visibility and in how patients perceive that visibility are now documented by objective scar scales and by patient-reported quality-of-life instruments, but counseling and treatment protocols tailored to this difference are not yet standardized (PMID 42557456), (PMID 41263428).

Terms

  • Hypertrophic scar: a raised, red scar confined to the original incision, the main scar complication tracked after blepharoplasty (PMID 36797842).
  • Keloid: scar tissue that grows beyond the original incision; rare after cosmetic eyelid surgery (PMID 36797842).
  • Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS): a scored assessment of scar vascularity, pigmentation, pliability and height, used to grade blepharoplasty scars objectively (PMID 42557456).
  • Manchester Scar Scale: a separate scored scar assessment tool, including color, contour, texture and distortion, compared against the Vancouver scale for periocular scars (PMID 40355707).
  • Fitzpatrick skin type: a classification of skin's response to sun exposure, from Type I (lightest) to Type VI (darkest), that predicts scar pigmentation risk (PMID 42557456).
  • Transconjunctival incision: an inner-lid incision used in lower blepharoplasty that leaves no external scar (PMID 2771349).
  • 5-fluorouracil (5-FU): an injectable antimetabolite drug used off-label to soften hypertrophic or cicatricial scar tissue (PMID 25025385).
  • Fractional CO2 laser: an ablative laser delivered in a pixelated pattern, used to resurface and soften an established eyelid scar (PMID 40574505).
  • Platelet-rich plasma / platelet-rich fibrin (PRP/PRF): a concentrate of the patient's own blood platelets and growth factors, applied or injected at the incision to support healing (PMID 42788940).
  • REEDA scale: a wound-healing score (redness, edema, ecchymosis, discharge, approximation) used in early postoperative scar research, distinct from scar scales used later in healing (PMID 40877601).

Papers cited on this page

Newest first.

2026
Impact of Facial Surgery Scars on Quality-of-Life: Perspectives of East Asian and White Patients
Garg SP, Wan R, Reddy NK, Shah KV, Adam TH, Ellis MF, et al. · J Craniofac Surg · PMID 41263428
2026
From Incision to Healing: An Evidence-Based Review of Scar Optimization in Upper Blepharoplasty
Aghajani A, Babaei L, Eshraghi B · Aesthetic Plast Surg · PMID 41193896
2026
Upper Blepharoplasty Suturing Techniques: A Paired-Eye Comparative Study of Intradermal vs Continuous Sutures
Soares R, Limongi RM, Allen RC, Bernardini F, Isaac DLC, de Ávila MP · Aesthet Surg J · Randomized Controlled Trial · PMID 42118953
2026
Injectable Platelet-Rich Fibrin for Blepharoplasty: Healing and Postoperative Outcomes
Isgandarova S, Aliyev T, Mammadov J, Hasanov F · Aesthet Surg J · PMID 41735797
2025
Evaluation of periocular scars after blepharoplasty and external dacryocystorhinostomy according to Manchester and modified Vancouver scar score
Erkan Pota Ç, Bilgiç A, Çetinkaya Yaprak A, İlhan HD, Kahraman U · Int Ophthalmol · PMID 40355707
2025
Absorbable versus non-absorbable sutures in upper eyelid blepharoplasty: a systematic review of clinical outcomes and follow-up burden
Safaripour A, Keshtan SB, Boumeri E, Alisofi M, Rabiei A, Dehvari S, et al. · BMC Ophthalmol · Systematic Review · PMID 41062983
2025
Survey of Neuromodulator Use for Optimization of Facial Scars and Blepharoplasty and Brow Lift Outcomes
Abraham MT, Husain S, Wong A, Gidumal S, Elahi E, Marmur E, et al. · Aesthet Surg J Open Forum · PMID 39989708
2025
Efficacy of Silicone Gel Versus Placebo for Postsurgical Scars of the Eyelids: A Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blinded Study
Karanfilian TS, Thuma T, Cheng T, Paramo R, Moon JY, Akella S, et al. · Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg · Randomized Controlled Trial · PMID 39946309
2025
The Effect of Hypericum Perforatum on Wound Healing in Upper Eyelid Blepharoplasty
Dertsiz Kozan B, Utlu B · Aesthetic Plast Surg · PMID 40877601
2023
Evaluation of the Risk of Hypertrophic Scarring and Keloid Following Eyelid Procedures: A Systematic Review
Anderson L, Vankawala J, Gupta N, Dorfman R, Pflibsen L, Vardanian A, et al. · Aesthet Surg J · Systematic Review · PMID 36797842
2021
Botulinum Toxin to Improve Lower Blepharoplasty Scar: A Double-Blinded, Randomized, Vehicle-Controlled Clinical Trial
Huang YL, Wallace CG, Hsiao YC, Lee MC, Huang JJ, Chang FC, et al. · Aesthet Surg J · Randomized Controlled Trial · PMID 34128526
2015
Injectable 5-FU with or without added steroid in periorbital skin grafting: initial observations
Yoo DB, Azizzadeh B, Massry GG · Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg · PMID 25025385
2010
Blepharoplasty complications
Lelli GJ, Lisman RD · Plast Reconstr Surg · PMID 20195127
2008
Power of the pinch: pinch lower lid blepharoplasty
Kim EM, Bucky LP · Ann Plast Surg · PMID 18434828
2004
Current concepts in aesthetic upper blepharoplasty
Rohrich RJ, Coberly DM, Fagien S, Stuzin JM · Plast Reconstr Surg · PMID 15536308